After 9 years in systematic trading at Goldman Sachs, I’ve developed a healthy skepticism toward financial “experts.” So when we decided to incorporate analyst ratings into our research at Ticker Nerd, I knew we needed to be rigorous in our approach.
We just completed a massive analysis of over 400,000 stock recommendations from 4,400 Wall Street analysts spanning 15 years. The results were eye-opening – and confirmed what many of us have long suspected.

Table of contents
ToggleThe Uncomfortable Truth About Analyst Ratings 🔍
Let’s start with something troubling: only 5% of all analyst calls were bearish (sell recommendations). Think about that. In a market where roughly half of all stocks underperform, 95% of recommendations are either “buy” or “hold.”
This overwhelming bullish bias isn’t just odd – it’s misleading for everyday investors. I’ve always believed in transparency, which is why we’re sharing these findings with you.
We Track Only the Best Analysts
Forget the hype — we rank and follow only the top 3% of Wall Street analysts.
Their latest stock picks are available in our free report.
Our Rigorous Methodology
To separate signal from noise, we implemented several critical filters:
1. Removing Redundant Calls 🧹
Many analysts make frequent, minor revisions to their recommendations – sometimes weekly! This creates the illusion of activity without adding value. We eliminated duplicates by only considering one call per stock per analyst every six months.
2. Focusing on What Matters: Excess Returns 📊
Since our philosophy centers on the 85/15 portfolio approach (85% in index funds, 15% in carefully selected growth opportunities), beating the market is essential. We calculated the excess return for each recommendation:
Excess Return = Stock Return – S&P 500 Return
This measures whether an analyst’s pick actually outperformed the broader market.
3. Penalizing “Lazy” Neutral Calls ⚖️
One of our most significant findings: many analysts use “hold” or “neutral” recommendations as a safety net. When a stock either skyrockets or plummets after a “hold” rating, that’s not helpful for investors making decisions.
We specifically penalized analysts for these non-committal calls when stocks made dramatic moves in either direction.
4. Evaluating Consistency and Statistical Significance 📏
Two critical metrics helped us identify truly skilled analysts:
- Sharpe Score: Measures the consistency of an analyst’s excess returns relative to volatility. High scores indicate reliable performance rather than occasional lucky picks.
- Statistical p-value: Determines whether an analyst’s directional accuracy is statistically significant or could have occurred by random chance.

The Elite 3%: What Sets Them Apart
After applying our comprehensive scoring system, only 119 analysts – less than 3% of all Wall Street voices – demonstrated consistent, statistically significant skill in their recommendations.
These elite analysts share several characteristics:
- Balanced perspective: They’re willing to issue sell recommendations when warranted
- Sector specialization: Deep expertise in specific industries
- Thoughtful timing: Less frequent but more meaningful calls
- Directional clarity: Clear buy or sell recommendations instead of ambiguous holds
Built on Real Analyst Performance
We’ve built a system that cuts through thousands of analyst calls to find the few that reliably lead to gains. Updated twice weekly.
What This Means For You 🤔
Even among our elite analysts, perfect accuracy doesn’t exist. Every analyst makes mistakes – but our filtered list gets it wrong less often than most.
This doesn’t mean you should blindly follow any analyst’s recommendation. Rather, these curated insights serve as a valuable starting point for your own research within our 85/15 framework.
Going forward, Market Radar newsletter subscribers will exclusively receive updates on calls from these top-performing analysts. While others might charge premium fees for unfiltered “expert” opinions, we believe you deserve better.
The Bottom Line
Wall Street produces an overwhelming volume of stock recommendations, but most add little value for everyday investors. By applying quantitative rigor and systematic analysis, we’ve identified the handful of voices truly worth your attention.
This research reflects the approach we take with all our analysis at Ticker Nerd – data-driven, transparent, and focused on what actually helps you build wealth responsibly.
Stop Wasting Time on Bad Stock Calls
Most analyst ratings aren’t worth your attention. We filter them and highlight only the highest-conviction buys backed by data.
